Do you know that the Bidens were
partners with Whitey Bolger's nephew....
Rosemont Seneca joined forces in doing business in China with another politically connected consultancy called the Thornton Group. The Massachusetts-based firm is headed by James Bulger, the nephew of the notorious mob hitman James “Whitey” Bulger. Whitey was the leader of the Winter Hill Gang, part of the South Boston mafia. Under indictment for 19 murders, he disappeared. He was later arrested, tried, and convicted.
James Bulger’s father, Whitey’s younger brother, Billy Bulger, serves on the board of directors of the Thornton Group. He was the longtime leader of the Massachusetts state Senate and, with their long overlap by state and by party, a political ally of Massachusetts Senator John Kerry.
Less than a year after opening Rosemont Seneca’s doors, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were in China, having secured access at the highest levels. Thornton Group’s account of the meeting on their Chinese-language website was telling: Chinese executives “extended their warm welcome” to the “Thornton Group, with its US partner Rosemont Seneca chairman Hunter Biden (second son of the now Vice President Joe Biden).”
Spin City as desperate Dems
flail around to try cover Biden's
corruption by using Trump as a
diversion and smokescreen.
If the Facts Come Out, it Could
Spell the End for Joe Biden
By Ray McGovern
The Joe Biden-friendly Establishment media has mounted a full-court press to “prove” that Biden is, well, not a crook.
The stakes are extremely high, Biden is vulnerable, and media players are using to a faretheewell the old adage about the best defense being a good offense. The New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street journal are desperately trying to steal the ball and get ahead in the publicity game. But time is about to run out, and pre-emptive propaganda is unlikely to snatch victory out of the jaws of defeat. IF the facts do come out and IF they are reported, Biden’s presidential hopes may suffer a mortal blow.
When the corruption in which the former Vice President and his son Hunter were involved in Ukraine becomes more widely known, the press wants to be in position to “show” that it’s all the fault of President Donald Trump and his lawyers for trying to derail Biden’s candidacy by exposing him. If past is precedent, the media will largely succeed. The question is whether enough people will, nevertheless, be able to see through this all-too-familiar charade.
“It was in February  when Yanukovych was overthrown, and just a few months later (in May), Joe Biden’s son and a close friend of John Kerry’s stepson, they both join the board of this Ukrainian gas company. And the name of that was Burisma Holdings,” said Joe Lauria, editor of Consortium News and a former correspondent for the Wall Street Journal. “So just after an American-backed coup, you have Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and this John Kerry family friend joining the board of probably the largest private gas producer in Ukraine. They installed the new government, and as the bounty of this coup, Joe Biden’s son personally profited. He would not have gotten that job if Yanukovych was still in power,” Lauria told the National Interest.
Will U.S. voters have any way of putting these dots together, and also in discerning, for example, how much truth there may be in charges that Vice President Biden pressed hard for the ouster of Ukraine’s Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin, who was canned after investigating corruption at Burisma Holdings Ukrainian gas company of which Hunter Biden was a board member? If the truth does come out, no one will have to rely on remarks from the likes of Rudy Giulinai, one of Trump’s lawyers, who has called the episode “an astounding scandal of major proportions.” That may be hyperbole but, still, the damage to Biden could be fatal.
And so, damage control is in full swing today at the NY Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and other “usual suspects,” with the NY Times winning the laurels with its Editorial Board, no less, weighing in with “What did Trump tell Ukraine’s president?” in addition to op-eds by Max Boot, Jennifer Rubin, Anne Applebaum, Greg Sargent and (my favorite), by George T. Conway III and Neal Katyal, “Trump has done plenty to warrant impeachment. But the Ukraine allegations are over the top.”
That title is correct.
_________________ Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Last edited by Fintan on Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:41 am; edited 2 times in total
Report: Hillary Clinton Speaking to
Elizabeth Warren Behind the Scenes
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has been speaking to Hillary Clinton behind
the scenes throughout her presidential bid, according to sources who
spoke with NBC News.
It was widely reported Clinton met with several potential 2020 candidates
at the beginning of the year, including former Colorado Gov. John
Hickenlooper (D), Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), and Sen. Elizabeth Warren
(D-MA). However, the failed presidential candidate has been speaking to
Warren in recent months, according to sources who spoke to NBC News.
Question: Who BENEFITS from the TRUMP-BIDEN HYSTERIA?
Answer: Queen-Maker in Waiting, Hillary Clinton
Question: Is Pocahontas a Deep State Op?
WARREN CONTINUES TO CLIMB WHILE BIDEN SLIPS
QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS;
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY IS NECK AND NECK
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is essentially tied with former Vice President Joe Biden in today’s Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pea-ack) University national poll. Warren gets 27 percent of the vote while Biden gets 25 percent of Democratic voters and independent voters who lean Democratic. Though well within the margin of error, this is the first time that a candidate other than Biden has had the numerical lead in the primary since Quinnipiac began asking the question in March.
The top two candidates are followed by Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders with 16 percent......
_________________ Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Talks halt between whistleblower's lawyers and
Schiff staff amid expectation he won’t testify
by Steven Nelson | October 31, 2019
The whistleblower whose complaint launched impeachment proceedings
against President Trump is unlikely to testify to Congress, as talks have
ceased between his legal team and committee leaders.
Mark Zaid, who along with Andrew Bakaj is an attorney for both the original
whistleblower and the second whistleblower, told the Washington Examiner
the legal team was willing to work with lawmakers so long as anonymity is
ensured. “We remain committed to cooperating with any congressional
oversight committee's requests so long as it properly protects and ensures
the anonymity of our clients,” Zaid said.
On Wednesday, Zaid and Bakaj declined to confirm or deny in a statement to the Washington Examiner that Eric Ciaramella, 33, a career CIA analyst and former Ukraine director on the NSC, was the whistleblower after a report by RealClearInvestigations.
So, some guy called Mark Zaid is the lawyer for the "whistleblowers"
behind the impeachment gambit against Trump by the Deep State.
"Zaid......." Now where did we hear that name before.
Oh yeah, I called him a CIA Fake lawyer. That's where.
Great to see he's still doing sterling work for the CIA.
Way to go Mark. You've got a nice little earner there.
FBI Whistleblower Demands First Amendment Rights
Sibel Edmonds legal battle intensifies
Because of her fluency in Middle Eastern languages, Sibel Dinez Edmonds, a Turkish-American, was hired by the FBI soon after the attacks of 9-11 to translate terrorism related intercepts, many of which were received long before 9-11.
Edmonds was fired by the FBI three weeks after going to the SJC. She retained Mark S. Zaid, Managing Partner of the Washington, D.C. law firm of Krieger & Zaid, PLLC, which specializes in national security cases
_________________ Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Trump represents more or less people who actually work for a living whereas the coup d'etat is composed of those who have never worked a day in their lives...... because they are the 'elite'....
......and a lifetime 'career' on the public payroll does not come under my definition of working for a living.
Think this 'lawyer' plus deep state parasites, clintons, bushes, obama, etc etc etc
Are the parasites hoping for another Watergate?
Rumsfeld & Cheney's Dirty Little Spy Secret
By Fintan Dunne
18th August 2002
While aides to Gerald Ford, Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney helped cover up the background to the death of CIA scientist, Frank Olson who fell from a 10th floor window in 1953, not long after he had been classified as a potential security risk.
Olson's son Eric says his father's conscience was troubled by awareness of Nazi-style CIA experiments on human subjects.
Kathryn Olmsted, University of California-Davis history professor, recently discovered files at the Gerald Ford library that showed White House officials deliberately withheld details of Olson's death from his family.
They included a memo from Dick Cheney, who was a White House assistant at the time, to Donald Rumsfeld, the chief of staff, on July 11, 1975. That memo warned that a lawsuit by Olson's family might make it necessary "to disclose highly classified national-security information.''
Another memo routed through Cheney and written by White House counsel Roderick Hills to the president cautioned that in any court action "it may become apparent that we are concealing evidence for national-security reasons.''
There must have been a lot to conceal, because the administration rolled out the red carpet for the Olson family. They were granted a meeting with the president Gerald Ford, who apologized for the death and promised full disclosure. Then they met with CIA Director William Colby, who gave them a file of documents comprising the CIA investigation into Olson's death.
Those documents confirmed other details disclosed in a 1975 commission of inquiry into CIA abuses --which had initially alerted the family. Befriended for years by Olson's boss, they had been led to believe that either accident or suicide for personal reasons explained the death. Now the CIA told the family that Frank Olson was a civilian Army scientist working on LSD, who had himself been given the drug without his knowledge. CIA reports were disclosed showing how this had led directly to his suicide some days later.
The family received $750,000 in return for waiving their right to further proceedings against the government. Rumsfeld and Cheney had helped resolve the case to the administration's satisfaction. It was an embarrassing episode that involved having to reveal the recklessness of the CIA's actions.
But those "admissions" were a well constructed pack of lies. The truth behind Frank Olson's death was far, far worse.
"JUST LET ME DISAPPEAR"
On 8th August 2002, relatives of Frank Olson took turns reading a long statement that contends that the scientist was murdered. "We have satisfied ourselves that Frank Olson was murdered because of security concerns regarding his work,'' said Olson's son Eric, who has spent years investigating his father's death.
Frank Olson was not, after all a civilian employee of the Army. He was a CIA employee working at Fort Detrick on precursor programs to MK-ULTRA, specializing in anthrax aerosols, possibly for for use in covert assassination.
Olson's passport, indicates that in the summer of 1953 --only months before his death-- he had visited secret joint American-British testing and research installations near Frankfurt, Germany where he had likely witnessed terminal experiments on expendable prisoners. His misgivings were such that a British intelligence agent who became aware of them recommended that Olson be denied further access to Porton Down, the British chemical-weapons research establishment.
A few days before his death Olson told his superior Lt. Col. Vincent Ruwet that he wanted to resign. Ruwet demurred. The following morning, he returned to insist that his resignation be accepted. Ruwet took Olson to New York where he saw a doctor who was experimenting with LSD for the CIA. Olson was also taken to see a New York hypnotherapist on the CIA payroll. He was pleading to be allowed resign, asking those around him to "just let me disappear."
On November 27th 1953, he checked into the Statler Hotel in Midtown New York, with a colleague, Robert Lashbrook. He called his wife Alice saying he felt "much better" and "looked forward to seeing her the next day."
Around 2 a. m. the following morning, Olson was found lying on the sidewalk in his undershirt and shorts, flat on his back with his legs smashed and bent at an acute angle. High above, a blind could be seen pushed through an empty window frame on the 10th floor. The hotel telephone operator overheard a call from room 1018A, in which a voice had said, "He's gone." The voice on the other end had replied, "That's too bad." Lashbrook admitted making calls but denied any such comment.
ONE LIE WITHIN ANOTHER
In 1994, Eric had his father's body exhumed. A forensic team, led by James Starrs of George Washington University, found a blow to Olson's temple which was not severe enough to have been caused by the high velocity fall. Starrs concluded that someone had knocked Olson out, and then thrown him out the window.
Following the autopsy, Eric Olson uncovered information from ex-intelligence agents that contract killers associated with the Trafficante mob family were hired by the CIA to murder his father. In 1997, he saw an inadvertently declassified assassination manual dating from late
1953, which advised "The most efficient accident... is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface..." The manual went on to recommend a blow to the temple to stun the subject.
Back in 1975, when the family met Seymour Hersh of The New York Times, he had said: "I can't believe you fell for that story for 22 years." In July
1975, the family held a news conference in their backyard saying they felt "violated by the CIA.'' In August 2002, they were back in the same yard again.
To have been so grievously misled by the agencies of government --not once-- but twice, must cause an anguish hard for any outsider to truly comprehend.
For their part in that second lie, Rumsfeld and Cheney have much to regret. Cheney was but an aide, but Rumsfeld was Chief of Staff at the time. The affair shows nothing of the nobility of purpose often portrayed in the White House drama TV series "West Wing." Rather it reeks of the sordid business of hiding murder by the State to cover up intelligence programs full of yet more murder.
British Intel was created by the (privately-owned) Bank of England around 1700 for the purpose of fomenting caca at home and abroad - caca which would compel the British government via the Bank's stooges (aka politicians) to borrow vast sums of money from the Bank.
In order to facilitate robbing and killing on a global scale.
The CIA is the child of British Intel and it exists for the same purposes.
Thanks for clarifying the reasons behind Putin-hate/Russia-hate.
It all comes back to the satanists who own/control the privately-owned central banks.
Rothschild.... et al.?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum