Audio: Immaculate Resurrection - Beautiful Truth

[Fintan]

The Immaculate Resurrection

What links the Giza Pyramids with 9/11, with the Comet NEAT,
with the Mayan Calendar; with Revelation, the Grateful Dead and
the New World Age?

The Twin, black-white Towers of blind certainty and belief, have fallen.
And after the 9/11 storm, a rainbow synthesis of Beautiful Truth is now
spreading on the Web. So, let's begin to Understand. Let's junk the myths.
Let's start afresh. Let's slip the Fear Matrix. See Reality. Discover who we Really are. It's Beautiful.

The Beautiful Truth Show - 22nd January, 2008

LISTEN:
Broadband Mp3 Audio
http://www.BreakForNews.com/audio/Beautiful080122a.mp3
Click to Play or Right-Click to 'Save As' and Download.

Dialup Mp3 Audio
http://www.BreakForNews.com/audio/Beautiful080122.mp3
Click to Play or Right-Click to 'Save As' and Download.

[zak247]

We never believed in Santa Clause in the hood. Cause we knew any white man coming around-fat-with a white beard would get his fat white ass mugged, and all the presents ripped off.

[zak247]

Jesus was a myth. He/she is an inner archetype. Existing in all of us. The ignorant literal minded sheep were led to believe in a Santa Clause type sky-god figure

What is mainly false about jesus is the interpretation that he is a god.

We need to interpret the myths for there mystical content, and then understand them as explaining the science of metaphysics[ science of regaining our lost nature]

Mythology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Mythology (disambiguation).

Mythology Portal

The word mythology[1] refers to a body of myths/stories that a particular culture believes to be true and that use the supernatural to interpret natural events and to explain the nature of the universe and humanity. Mythology also refers to the branch of knowledge dealing with the collection, study and interpretation of myths, also known as mythography.

Main article: Religion and mythology
Significantly, none of the scholarly definitions of "myth" (see above) imply that myths are necessarily false. In a scholarly context, the word "myth" may mean "sacred story", "traditional story", or "story about gods", but it does not mean "false story". Therefore, scholars may speak of "religious mythology" without meaning to insult religion. (For instance, a scholar may call Christian and Muslim scriptures "myths" without meaning to insult Christianity and Islam. The Christian apologist C. S. Lewis made a clear distinction between myth and falsehood when he referred to the life of Christ as a myth "which is also a fact".)[18] However, this scholarly use of the word "myth" may cause confusion and offense, because of the popular use of "myth" to mean "falsehood".

[zak247]

The world we live in is an ELLIPSE. An imperfect circle. That’s why ignorance, suffering, and evil exists.


Hermes said thousands of years ago:

As above[ macrocosm] so below [microcosm]


TRUE DICHOTOMY= ELLIPSE[ IMPERFECT CIRCLE] ( DEVIL-EVIL-SUFFERING)

VS [PERFECT CIRCLE] ( GOD-HAPPINESS-PEACE-UNITY)

This dichotomy has been given to us in allegories that include mythological religion. THE REALITY IS THAT MAN HAS FALLEN TO AN ELLIPSE FROM A PERFECT CIRCLE.
That is the meaning of the allegory of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden
[ perfect circle]. The Garden of Eden is a symbol for the perfect circle.

Here is the great secret.


WHEN IN THE OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM, [MACROCOSM] WHERE THERE ARE 11 OUT OF LINE CIRCLES, RE-PERFECTS ITSELF. THE 9 INNER OUT-OF-LINE CIRCLES IN HUMANS [MICROCOSM] WILL AUTOMATICALLY COME INTO REALIGNMENT

9/11!

As above[ macrocosm] so below [ microcosm]

Its that simple!

[zak247]

Oh, one more thing before I go to bed.

If you ask yourself, why do I know this [ and much more, by the way]
Its because

I am the real Neo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Count em

[e-lamb]

[MichaelC]

Thanks Fintan. Great description of santa claus and the sheeple mentality/propoganda machine. Though you don't like the catholic church i do appreciate the very rich mythological and meditational references that it provides and these have served as guideposts for me to get though this incarnation.
'Mythology' seems to have a negative connatation - meaning 'untrue' - in today's earth-bound thinking but these mythologies were noted by wiser ones than us and they refer directly to the energies within each one of us.

I would suggest the reading of "The Hero with a thousand faces" or any of the several books by Joseph Campbell for a better understanding of the importance of mythological references.

[coalraker]

Fintan, I am listening to your audio and I gotta say its great to hear your voice! The news of Santa is causing market meltdowns as you speak.


We know that being centered may be defined as movement in non-movement. Picture clay revolving on a potters wheel. The clay is not centered until the clay has found stillness in movement.
Merry go round in circles.
Mary fly high like a bird up in the sky.

Beautiful

[zak247]

Anyway, Congratulations Fintan. It seems you have been to the mountaintop.

Youe eyes has seen the glory of the comming of universal love, light, unity and real knowledge.

To Micheal:

Its the interpretation of the myths that the church and all in exoteric religion has distorted. It is our job to un-distort it.

[andymonk]

This video may be of interest. Its over three hours long but well worth the watch. http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4555365073003895154&q=Pharmacratic+Inquisition&total=59&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

[RockDock]

Fintan:

the link "View Animation of Comet NEAT approach to the Sun
http://breakfornews.com/bfn2/comet_neat_anim_feb2003.gif " is 404 not found.

Please check the URL and re-post. Thanks.

edit: thanks for fixing that link! Beautiful thing. Neat even!

cheers

[coalraker]

[urbanspaceman]

Great show, Fintan! As always, thought provoking and stimulating, and this time, very very funny! Loved your Santa Claus satire...I laughed out loud a few times. The Parental Reserve! Ha!

A few points of debate:

720 DEGREE ROTATION OF THE ELECTRON

I admit I haven't had a chance to read Justin's paper yet. But I'm sharing my initial reaction to the notion that the 720 degree spin may be a 360 degree spin seen from 2 points of view, or seen from the inside and outside, so you get 2 x 360. My first thought is that this is very esoteric and confuses more than it explains...but perhaps I'm not getting something. I say this as someone who has studied Milo Wolff's work. The math is beyond me, but according to Milo the quantum equations deal with symmetrical spheres, but what doesn't fit is that if something spins like a planet or a top it bulges at the equator due to centrifugal force and the sphere isn't a perfect one anymore. My understanding was that Milo's suggested solution was the electron was not spinning like a planet around an axis (cylindrical rotation), but it was "tumbling" around a center (spherical rotation). If I spin a ball along 2 axes, for example, it may not return to the start point if you rotate it 360 degrees on both of those axes....if it "tumbles" in a particular way it will take 2 turns to get back to the starting position.

So there is no need to postulate something turning inside out....it's just the way you can get a sphere to spin. And what fit's the equations is that the sphere doesn't buldge, and it remains a proper sphere as it tumbles.

Here are some examples of spins that take more than 360 degrees to return to the start points:



A SHORT CRITIQUE OF CALLEMAN

I am not an expert in Calleman's work, the Mayan Calendar, nor have I read one of his books. But I have listened to many interviews and went through his website, and found ideas quite fascinating, and spent a bit of time also reading some critiques of his work. I think everyone can agree on this site that we live in a time of rapid growth and change, and that fact is hard to deny, but the nature of that change is still difficult to understand or predict. We are all looking for meaning and ways to contextualize these rapid world-wide changes. Calleman does offer up some stimulating theories.

But I have a strong objection to using the Mayan Calendar as a "tool of prophecy". Since we're on the subject of moving from child mode to adult mode, and that is perhaps what the coming Big Shift includes, I think only children can believe something like "prophecy"...adults believe in "scientific prediction". There's an important difference.

The first red flag was the lectures of Ian Xel Lungold, an artist who gave lectures on the Mayan Calandar based on Calleman's work. Lungold passed away in 2005, so unfortunately he never got the chance to comment on his predictions leading up to 2012. But sufficed to say...Lungold's predictions inspired by Calleman's work were...EMBARRASSING. They were completely fantastical. According to Lungold we should have been shaking hands with space aliens and been traveling around with Star Trek transporter technology by now.

I'm not saying that Calleman can be held responsible for Lungold's ideas. But there's a general running theme between them...there is at times little distinction between scientific fact, historical fact, documentary fact, interpretation, and speculation. Sometimes they are liberally mixed together, and I find this highly irresponsible. Calleman was, in a way, called out on this in a recent interview when Calleman claimed that he used the Mayan Calendar to predict the dip in the US dollar.



Let's say for the sake of argument, that Calleman's interpretation of the Mayan Calendar is correct, and that the Mayan's were tracking these cyclic influxes of energy, creating periods of light and dark that affected world history. Does that mean we can 'prophesize' specific events with it? To my mind, it's like saying because a psychologist has discovered a pattern common to all human psychological development that he can predict that John Smith is going to get laid on his prom night. Haven't we learned by now, 30 years after the birth of Chaos theory and the growth of the complexity sciences, that specific scientific predictions of complex systems are mere childish fantasy?

For an interesting debate Calleman's interpretation on the Mayan Calendar, google JENKINS CALLEMAN DEBATE.

THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY?

Does the Yuga cycle in Hindu philosophy offer no insight into our current age, as Fintan suggests? Fintan does make a good point. It does not seem that we are descending into the Kali Yuga, or the darkest age, when it looks more like we are close to breaking through to the next level. The Hindus must have got it wrong. But there are others who are connecting some different dots.

The audio clip above was from a show hosted by Walter Cruttenden. Cruttenden has lately become a focal point for the "alternate history" movement that began with author Graham Hancock. This community is beginning to form a consensus that the rise and fall of civilizations is cyclical, and that the megalithic builders who left their monuments all over the earth is evidence of a high civilzation that existed in a Golden Age 12000 years ago. Cruttenden has suggested a mechanism for this: we are in a binary star system, and when our sun approaches it's sister sun (or other massive body...it might not be a star) the influx of EM energy changes human consciousness.

It's true that Hindu scholars are all over the place when it comes to describing the Yugas. But some have offered some cross cultural reconstructions. This was printed in "East West" magazine in 1932, which Cruttenden refers to often.



This is Cruttenden's modern rerendering of it:



If we assume cyclical time of this kind, we don't have to choose between evolution (what Fintan is supporting) and de-evolution (which is how some Hindu philosophers describe the Yugas: a series of descending ages). This model includes both. In this version humans de-evolved until the bottom of the dark age at around 500AD, and have been evolving ever since that time. The Yugas are now ascending.

As I said above, there's little doubt that we live in a significant time and that a wave of change is coming. But I can't say with confidence, as Fintan has, that it hasn't come before, and that we are at a completely unique point in the history of the universe. A time similar to today, a time of globally raising consciousness, may have occurred before...MANY times before, even. We may be going through a global rebirth that has occurred 500 times in 500 civilizations, and forgotten about it every time in the collective memory.

Perhaps this is what the ancients have to teach us about the current world changes. If we are the descendants of a previous high civilization, it will never be EXACTLY like it was back then, but perhaps they knew that human culture had risen and fallen in predictable patterns over and over and over again, and they wanted to try and preserve that knowledge for the next cycle. This may explain the ancient obsession with astrology, and in particular the precession of the equinox, a cycle that lasts around 24000 years. All major religions of the world refer to it in some way or another.

Perhaps this also helps us put ancient "prophecies" in a modern context, such as the Mayan calendar, the Hopi cosmology of the 4 worlds, and the apparent astrology of the pyramids at Giza. They may not be predictions of the psychic variety, as in a kind of fortune telling of specific future events due to precognition. They may be general predictions based on PAST events. The ancients perhaps knew about these light and dark ages the way we today understand the light and dark periods of day/night, summer/winter...it's just another astronomical cycle that deeply effect history and the planet. It's childish folly to expect an ancient calendar to predict when I'm going to get a raise at work on Thursday...but it may be quite scientific to predict that the position of stellar bodies and cosmic radiation all affect general trends in plantary weather, the economy, and, in a general way, even human consciousness.

"The Great Year": a documentary by Cruttenden

[bri]

I'm wondering if Marko Rodin's theories tie into this somehow.

http://www.rodinmath.com/

I'm just getting started on listening to his newest interview, and his website is pretty massive, mathematics wise. It'll take quite some time to discern whether it's bullshit at this point, he has been on Jeff Rense, and other such shows. I only have an inkling of what he is talking about so far.

------------------------------------------------------------

Fintan, I feel your combined enthusiasm and frustration, beauty and anger.

Superb show!

It touched a nerve.

You seem a bit shaken, there's a tension I can hear in your voice.


You alright?

I know I'm not, I'm getting it too.

[Wu Li]

I appreciate your articulations so greatly it may be beyond measure.

Peace and love