FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Introduction & Posting Guidelines

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 - The Verdict Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8166

PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:21 pm    Post subject: Introduction & Posting Guidelines Reply with quote

CAUTION: Read the following very carefully before posting.
If you don't follow the guidelines, your posts will be deleted.



9/11 - The Verdict

When you get right down to it, their alternative version of 9/11 has
easily trumped the government version for sheer volume of
complete and utter rubbish content.


It's time to sort out the wheat from the chaff, and reach
a final verdict on what happened, how it happened, why
it happened and what group(s) were responsible.

It's time to determine what are the persuasive questions about 9/11
which raise a "reasonable doubt" --on the same balance of probability
which determines the verdict in a civil lawsuit.

It's time to make the call on 9/11.

BreakForNews.com is launching a review and evaluation of the key
evidence that 9/11 was not planned and carried out by terrorists --
unaided by any outside agency, group or political interest.


This will be in three phases, equivalent to the stages
of a civil or criminal trial process.

Phase 1) Preparation of a Book of Evidence
Phase 2) A Trial process of debate and criticism of the evidence.
Phase 3) Final Verdict on the basis of evidence meeting a civil proof standard.


Phase 1

The first Phase is opening now. It is not a debate. It is a presentation
of summary/overview evidence already in the public domain, or new
evidence.

The emphasis is on overview and summary presentation -not detail.

Don't post long and arduous treatises on detailed specifics of the 9/11
events. Rather post lists of hyperlinks to material on the internet which
supports the point of the case you are making.

For brevity don't post images - just hyperlinks to images.
Pick resilient hyperlinks which are likely to remain online.

For example, if you wanted to make a case that Building 7 did
not collapse due to fire, you might post links to online articles which
argue this, and hyperlinks to supporting inages. In addition you could
post links to opposing articles which dismiss these claims and to
rebuttals of these opposing articles. Add a few summary paragraphs
of your own --stating why you find the non-fire arguments to be
compelling on the balance of probabilities, and you are done!

That's the kind of broad summary and overview which will enhance
the chances that your evidence will make it to the Trial Phase.
The evidence which makes it to the Trial Phase will be the best case.

Don't just weigh in and post willy-nilly. You need to carefullly consider
all aspects of the 9/11 issue and ask yourself if there are specific
issues where you reckon you can make a cast-iron case for presentation
as evidence.


Don't even bother to post arguments where there are strong
counterarguments or where a judgement relies on highly personal
interpretation of visual images to reach a conclusion. Weak arguments
and poor evidence will simply not make it to the Trial phase and is
a waste of your time.

Remember, in a civil or criminal case, a good prosecutor invariably selects
to present to a jury the best evidence at his/her disposal. That's the way
a successful prosecution is obtained.

That's exactly the approach which we will be taking.

You must be hard-headed and skeptical of all evidentiary issues.
Verify that evidence is firm; that events actually happened.

Play to your strengths in expertiese. Present both sides of the argument,
and state why you think the evidence supports a firm conclusion.

Minimize the level of detail. Your presentation should follow the same
principles as the abstract of a clinical study. Summary -not detail.

CAUTION: If you do not follow the above guidelines, your posts will
simply be deleted. We all are already drowning in a mass of detail
on the 9/11 attacks. We do not need more of the same.


( See: 9/11 Minority Report: 'An Orgy Of Evidence' Audio Mp3 )

In fact, as the Orgy of Evidence audio shows, that mass of detail may
be the best way of ensuring that a clear case is NEVER made about 9/11.

Here are the major sections for evidence presentation:

Quote:
Phase 1
-----------------

- Twin Towers
- WTC 7 & Complex
- Pentagon
- Flight 93

- Tactical Preparation
- Tactical Execution on 9/11

- Perpetrators & Motivation

- Official Coverup
- Alternative Coverup

Phase 2 and 3
-----------------
The Trial
The Final Verdict
-----------------


Remember to review before you post:

Is what you are posting: firm, specific evidence that
9/11 was NOT planned and carried out by terrorists,
alone and unaided by any outside agency, group or
political interests?

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.


Last edited by Fintan on Sun Aug 16, 2015 7:58 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
stannrodd



Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 521
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Fintan,

I wasn't allowed to post a new thread ..in VERDICT .. since I am not a moderator according to the error screen I received.

But I can .. somehow . post to yours/this sticky .. so here goes.

At the end of this thread ...

http://www.breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2854

You refer members here to "The Verdict" forum ..

I would like to start the ball rolling by suggesting that such charlatan behaviour as Chris A Brown and his concrete core be moved directly to the skeptics or bullshit bin..

Stann Cool

_________________
Ultimately, the study of all that is .. based on everything we have learned about our existence and our universe .. is only theory... 1984
PsytationStation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8166

PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's actually not a bad idea at all to have
a 9/11 Bullshit Bin for all the fruitloop issues. Laughing

I'll give it some thought as to how that would work.

It would be a useful and aptly-named resource. Wink

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
stannrodd



Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 521
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fintan wrote:
That's actually not a bad idea at all to have
a 9/11 Bullshit Bin for all the fruitloop issues. Laughing

I'll give it some thought as to how that would work.

It would be a useful and aptly-named resource. Wink


I have always felt that there is useful energy .. even in bullshit.

The disproof of bullshit strengthens the truth outcome. I don't know the answer .. as in 7x6=42 .. the ultimate answer to the ultimate question.

But I can smell manure a mile off.

Effective opposition and well researched data is all that is needed. The Trolls will die under the bridge. Laughing

Not wanting to be a billy goat gruff , but I'm pleased to see Christopher has left the forum for good.

Stann

_________________
Ultimately, the study of all that is .. based on everything we have learned about our existence and our universe .. is only theory... 1984
PsytationStation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 - The Verdict Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.