FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Sandy Hook Shootings Investigation Latest
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 29, 30, 31, 32  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
skinters



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 661

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andrew wrote:
Quote:
No.

I'm only saying how i think it went down to which i'm entitled to do.


Wrong, you even told me what I think and when I pointed it out I don't you still carried on with it.


Would you like to give me an example of what your talking about ?.

Its a waste of time bickering over small tat when we could be spending time going over specific points.

Such as,

Quote:
Apparently all the "victims" had something in common in that they had only been there for a couple of years or so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew



Joined: 08 Mar 2012
Posts: 219

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me:
"Why do you think every one on the day would be an actor?"



You:
"No mate.

I was looking at it in the way YOU thinking it was all done with actors."

Me:
I don't think that and I don't think others who see it as a hoax think they were all actors (in on it; just a few).

Other than in the the way:

"Just like a regular fire drill, it involves all the people in the whole building, but most of the people would be none the wiser if it was a drill or real a real fire. Until what they are told afterwards.

If they were sent home and told not to return because there was a fire and it damaged some chemical tank (a hoax). How many would have to be in on that, even if it was a building with thousands of people."

It gets reported that it "happened", it will be cleared up next week and the workers return to work. No ones none the wiser.

Simple type of trick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skinters



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 661

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andrew wrote:


I didn't when my kids went to school.



Well someone did...maybe the teachers.

Quote:


Stop part quoting me.


Where did i part quote you ?...iv never heard that said before.

Andrew wrote:
Me:
"Why do you think every one on the day would be an actor?"

You:
"No mate.

I was looking at it in the way YOU thinking it was all done with actors."

Me:
I don't think that and I don't think others who see it as a hoax think they were all actors (in on it; just a few).



And whats the big deal there ?.

If your confident in what your about i wouldn't nit pick over every single word.

I just went off this,

Andrew wrote:
.

As far as I can see it was a hoax at the fire station not even the school, some very bad acting by the parents and such (gun control advocates etc). With no dead bodies. So as there are no dead bodies, as at least proof that something really did happen then its just like a film set and acting hoax.



Thats where i thought you said you think it was a hoax with actors...i mean you say it there...if you have changed your views i understand now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew



Joined: 08 Mar 2012
Posts: 219

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Thats where i thought you said you think it was a hoax with actors...i mean you say it there...if you have changed your views i understand now.


Stop twisting what I have said.

I did not say everyone at the school, all the police etc would have had to have been actors.

Quote:

Where did i part quote you ?...iv never heard that said before.


I said it works both ways.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skinters



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 661

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andrew wrote:
Quote:
Thats where i thought you said you think it was a hoax with actors...i mean you say it there...if you have changed your views i understand now.


Stop twisting what I have said.

I did not say everyone at the school, all the police etc would have had to have been actors.


Not twisting i thought that was your line of events to which your entitled to.

So you feel 'some' were actors ?.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew



Joined: 08 Mar 2012
Posts: 219

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So you feel 'some' were actors ?.



Me:
"Why do you think every one on the day would be an actor?" (for the hoax scenario).



You:
"No mate.

I was looking at it in the way YOU thinking it was all done with actors."

Me:
I don't think that and I don't think others who see it as a hoax think they were all actors (in on it; just a few).

Other than in the the way:

"Just like a regular fire drill, it involves all the people in the whole building, but most of the people would be none the wiser if it was a drill or real a real fire. Until what they are told afterwards.

If they were sent home and told not to return because there was a fire and it damaged some chemical tank (a hoax). How many would have to be in on that, even if it was a building with thousands of people."

It gets reported that it "happened", it will be cleared up next week and the workers return to work. No ones none the wiser.

Simple type of trick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew



Joined: 08 Mar 2012
Posts: 219

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

.


Can we agree that "gun control" is a bad idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skinters



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 661

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andrew wrote:


"Just like a regular fire drill, it involves all the people in the whole building, but most of the people would be none the wiser if it was a drill or real a real fire. Until what they are told afterwards.

If they were sent home and told not to return because there was a fire and it damaged some chemical tank (a hoax). How many would have to be in on that, even if it was a building with thousands of people."

It gets reported that it "happened", it will be cleared up next week and the workers return to work. No ones none the wiser.

Simple type of trick.


I'm trying to figure out how all that would play out.

So if it was a drill of sorts, where do the real responders parents, teachers, students fit into all of it ?.

The missing children/ teachers ?....they would have to be knowingly part of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EddieT



Joined: 28 Jun 2006
Posts: 477

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skinters wrote:
EddieT wrote:
New batch of Sandy Hook actors. Establishing the right edge of the discourse:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAYLr6u2FyY



Why do you suspect this pro gun guy as being an actor ?.

Trying to understand the way you looking at this one.


Same thing we see on TV every night. Representative of the left, representative of the right. Drama, debate. With an event like Sandy Hook, the left has an insurmountable advantage. Compromise is reached, the right submits to a few changes. Goal is to change the status quo, inch by inch, to the dogma of the ultimate agenda.

_________________
"Man is the only creature who refuses to be what he is"- Albert Camus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RedMahna



Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1512
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EddieT -
Quote:
Same thing we see on TV every night. Representative of the left, representative of the right. Drama, debate. With an event like Sandy Hook, the left has an insurmountable advantage. Compromise is reached, the right submits to a few changes. Goal is to change the status quo, inch by inch, to the dogma of the ultimate agenda.


i had written out a wonderfully sarcastic piece to answer this, EddieT, and realized that what we are merely trying to do is save ourselves as humans from everything going wrong all around us while some others make it increasingly harder by magnifying it with highly-complicated wild-goose-chases from every direction.

is that not the ultimate battle of good & evil somehow? i don't know if it's correctable by same humans...

red

_________________
just cos things are fucked up doesn't mean it isn't progress...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
skinters



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 661

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EddieT wrote:


Same thing we see on TV every night. Representative of the left, representative of the right. Drama, debate. With an event like Sandy Hook, the left has an insurmountable advantage. Compromise is reached, the right submits to a few changes. Goal is to change the status quo, inch by inch, to the dogma of the ultimate agenda.


Like the false left right paradigm ?.

I know and understand that.

So might it then be possible that this guy is for real its just they chose to show that particular speech to highlight a particular agenda ?.

Looking at the ultimate agenda, and it has to be brought up sooner than later, i always thought it would result in a situation that would bring in total civil was in the US.

I don't know how much weight that carries if the plan is an incremental attack on the 2nd amendment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EddieT



Joined: 28 Jun 2006
Posts: 477

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RedMahna wrote:
EddieT -
Quote:
Same thing we see on TV every night. Representative of the left, representative of the right. Drama, debate. With an event like Sandy Hook, the left has an insurmountable advantage. Compromise is reached, the right submits to a few changes. Goal is to change the status quo, inch by inch, to the dogma of the ultimate agenda.


i had written out a wonderfully sarcastic piece to answer this, EddieT, and realized that what we are merely trying to do is save ourselves as humans from everything going wrong all around us while some others make it increasingly harder by magnifying it with highly-complicated wild-goose-chases from every direction.

is that not the ultimate battle of good & evil somehow? i don't know if it's correctable by same humans...

red


I think the battle of good vs. evil is our battle for personal and cultural freedom against their never-ending desire for ever-increasing amounts of control. The elites, the powers that be, whatever you want to call those who run the civilizations that conquered the world, they are invariably seeking more and more control over our lives so that they can enact their vision for the future with the least amount of interference possible.

I wish I knew how it was all going to end...but I don't even really like to speculate anymore.

_________________
"Man is the only creature who refuses to be what he is"- Albert Camus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 29, 30, 31, 32  Next
Page 30 of 32

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.