FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Random Comment

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
je-demande



Joined: 26 Mar 2015
Posts: 246
Location: London

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:24 pm    Post subject: Random Comment Reply with quote

Someone posted this "comment" on my You Tube Channel and I thought "je me demande"

.... Numerous planes have slammed into a mountain or hillside at full speed. In dense fog or a very dark night, there's been many times where there was no warning at all. In all of those cases, not once did the plane bury itself underground, leaving no trace of wreckage above ground. No plane of any type has ever slammed into the ground and completely buried itself.
Fighter jets have nose dived at high speed, but none of those jets get buried,.......not even a portion of the plane gets buried. That, and other first time oddities, only occurred on that day.
It was the first time in almost 100 days that Larry Silverstein wasn't having breakfast in the top of one of the twin towers in the morning. it was the first time his daughter wasn't there either. it was the first time his daughter and his son were both late for work inside the towers on the same day. it was the first time a high rise building fell as a result of relatively small fires. it was the first time an airplane penetrated a skyscraper and the nose of the plane came out of the opposite side unscathed. it was the first time our entire defense system failed simultaneously. it was the first ever unmolested assault on the pentagon building. it was the first time a high rise building collapsed into it's foot print other than a planned demolition. it was the first time firemen at street level knew the exact time that a skyscraper was going to collapse. it was the first time that anyone collected nearly double the full insured amount for one incident. it was the first time that several non responsive airplanes flew in our skies without one of them being intercepted. it was the first time that 2 massive skyscrapers collapsed neatly into their footprints. it was the first time an inept Cessna pilot maneuvered a jumbo jet such that no other experienced pilot thought it was possible. it was the first time that 4 jumbo jets crashed without any of them leaving a trace of the passengers, luggage, or the plane itself. it's the first time that jet fuel could cause the collapse of a massive structure, but fail to singe a paper passport. it was the first time that all of N.O.R.A.D.S. systems failed at once. it was the first time an attack took place whereby jet planes crashed into skyscrapers while our air defense was out practicing to defend against the possibility of jet planes crashing into a skyscraper. it was the first time a fire dept commander discussed with the building owner what option the fire dept. should exercise regarding fires in that building. it was the first time the expression 'pull it' didn't translate to pulling down/demolishing a building when that was the subject being discussed. it was the first time phones were used with perfect clarity for lengthy periods in an airplane at 30,000 feet without failure or lost signal. it was the first time our nation was under attack and the president didn't do anything for 10 minutes or more. it was the first time our vice president ordered a defense stand down while a plane was fast approaching to crash into a federal building. it was the first time while under attack our secretary of defense couldn't be located for half an hour. it was the first time we were attacked on home soil yet our top leaders tried to stop an investigation of that attack. it was the first time after an attack on home soil that our top leaders refused to testify, then refused to testify under oath, then refused to testify separately, then refused to testify if recorded, then refused to testify if reporters were present, then refused to testify for more than a set period of time, then refused to testify a 2nd time if called,......then only agreed to testify with all these restrictions in place due to immense public pressure.

_________________
Vaut mieux prévenir que guérir.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillsearchingtruth



Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 331

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you sometimes feel like you would have been better off not knowing this shit? Not questioning, not critiquing what has been presented to the viewer/reader as the "facts"?

Being "awake" to what has transpired has without a shadow of my life made me look at the world through a whole different lens and has invariably scuppered relationships I have had with people and has shaped my mind in a way which has made me a truly cynical bastard.

Yet for all that, here we are 15 years later millions and millions have been killed, the west is fucking collapsing, the rich have massively enlarged their power and aint a damn thing changed.

Those that question are very much in the minority and by the time it's accepted to be anything but the narrative presented well it won't matter "because that was the past"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
je-demande



Joined: 26 Mar 2015
Posts: 246
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course such a random yet profound "Message" puts everything in context -

everything is a lie etc.... But what I think hammered this harder to me is

because it is crammed onto a single page meaning all these endless

revelations are resonating together in a matter of seconds inside your brain

without let up or mercy.

_________________
Vaut mieux prévenir que guérir.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimbo



Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But what about the 28 Pages?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
je-demande



Joined: 26 Mar 2015
Posts: 246
Location: London

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jimbo wrote:
But what about the 28 Pages?


What would your executive summary of the 28 Pages be Jimbo?

_________________
Vaut mieux prévenir que guérir.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimbo



Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

je-demande wrote:
Jimbo wrote:
But what about the 28 Pages?


What would your executive summary of the 28 Pages be Jimbo?


It's probably bunk but former senator Bob Graham is doing such an excellent acting job pretending the 28 pages are real it gives me pause. That goes for everyone who has to know 9/11 was an inside job, guys like Richard Clarke. They go on camera and write entire books critical of the official story while ignoring evidence of explosives or the coincidence of first time coincidences listed above.

I'm trying to come up with a metaphorical story which symbolizes parallel but entirely different narratives. Mr. Jones' window is broken by a baseball, a nearly impossible shot hit from a baseball diamond acres away. Nonetheless, to the grownups the obvious culprit is the neighborhood bully, Butch. After all his name is scrawled on the ball. (buch) But then the neighborhood clever boy, call him Fintan, wonders if this may be a way for Mr. Jones to get a new window from the insurance company, figuring that Mr. Jones broke the window himself and somehow planted the ball. Suddenly Butch is dead. And then there is a fire at the insurance company. Two narratives squelched! Along comes Bob Graham. He has seen secret evidence that Butch's father who was a shady contract carpenter set this us so he could install a new window. But Butch's father suddenly left town. Meanwhile everyone has forgotten about the broken window and stand in awe of the new window paid for by insurance money.

Or something …
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
noplacebo



Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 205

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 8:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But Jimbo the 28 pages state what everyone saw on tv, the ball was hit from the diamond in the park and then the window was smashed.
You aren't one of those nasty conspiracy theorists are you, like the ones we see on tv, uuurgh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
je-demande



Joined: 26 Mar 2015
Posts: 246
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

noplacebo wrote:
But Jimbo the 28 pages state what everyone saw on tv, the ball was hit from the diamond in the park and then the window was smashed.
You aren't one of those nasty conspiracy theorists are you, like the ones we see on tv, uuurgh.


http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/09/07/the-tide-is-turning-the-official-story-is-now-the-conspiracy-theory-paul-craig-roberts/

_________________
Vaut mieux prévenir que guérir.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
noplacebo



Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 205

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2016 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Je-demande,
Touché.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
je-demande



Joined: 26 Mar 2015
Posts: 246
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

noplacebo wrote:
Je-demande,
Touché.


Wow!! crikey your hand's are cold!:-)

_________________
Vaut mieux prévenir que guérir.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
je-demande



Joined: 26 Mar 2015
Posts: 246
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.

The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.

One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steinger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.

Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.

Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them.

The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).

Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).

A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.

News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.
Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.

Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.

AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.

The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.

_________________
Vaut mieux prévenir que guérir.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.