|
| :: Previous topic :: Next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fintan
Site Admin
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 5568
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:27 pm Post subject: Get Your War On - With Nancy the Finger |
  |
|
UNDER THE VELVET GLOVE IS.....
by Fintan Dunne, BreakForNews.com, 26th October 2006
If anybody can disabuse you of wild notions you may have accidentally developed
about the forthcoming Democratic control of Congress, Nancy Pelosi can.
Nancy has famously hit the headlines already, with a typical finger-wagging
warning that as the likely Democratic Speaker, she intends to "clean House".
Next time she points that finger, someone should tell her where to stick it.
Nancy's idea of cleaning House does not involve an iota of rollback on
the booming U.S. military budget. It involves more spending. According
to Nancy, the Bush administration isn't spending enough money.
She backed a call by a defense experts panel which maintains the US Army
has no effective combat-ready, strategic reserve, because there isn't
sufficient military funding. Pelosi back the group, saying: "this failure to
maintain military readiness is unacceptable and dangerous."
Pelosi has also opposed every congressional efforts to set any date for
the withdraw of US troops from Iraq, and supports full funding
for the continuing occupation.
And it isn't just on Iraq that Pelosi's velvet glove packs an iron fist. When
Amnesty International harshly criticized Israel's heavy-handed re-invasion
of the Occupied Territories in October 2002, Pelosi backed Tom Delay's
resolution in support of Israel.
Despite being so at one with Delay and Bush, the velvet-gloved Pelosi is
more predicatbly aligned with the Democratic/NATO wing of the New World
Order. Along with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid she organized several
meetings between Democratic aides and a group of national-security
experts which included former Gen. Wesley Clark, the ex-NATO supreme
allied commander who bloodied his hands in NATO's Yugoslavia campaign.
The iron fist side of the NWO is represented by Bush, the GOP and the
US military industrial establishment. These are the kick-ass dudes who
go in to "pacify" countries requiring strategic occupation. Countries like
Afghanistan and Iraq, for example.
The velvet glove is the Democrats, the EU and NATO, who move in after
the initial carnage has kiled enough people. Their occupation is redefined
as a "peacekeeping mission."
The same pattern is on the cards for Iraq. The latest hand-wringing over
the situation there is part of the groundwork for the deployment of the
velvet glove for Iraq. One which packs exactly the same imperial punch.
And how close is Pelosi to all this?
The trail starts here, at the G8 summits:
| Quote: | Jerry Fletcher:
| Quote: | Discussions of the heads of state and government are held behind closed doors,
with G8 Sherpas (personal representatives of leaders) being the only outsiders.
Decisions are adopted on the principle of consensus. |
Ok - does anybody else find something odd about this? Uh, Sherpa? Hello? WTF?
...Our sherpa friend SITS IN ON THE F*CKING SUMMIT MEETING! Sure, I can read global
conspiracy into a grocery receipt, but I found this fact to be rather astounding.
I mean, the eight apparently most powerful human beings on earth go into a heavily guarded,
private, locked room to discuss the future of the world ... along with eight other dudes that
you've never heard of. Anybody? Odd? Uh.. Security Clearance Sherpa?
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=753&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15#7333 |
These Sherpas are personal representatives of the G8 leaders. At the
1998 summit in St. Petersburg, William J. Clinton's "Sherpa" was a guy
called James B. Steinberg, of the Brookings Institute.
Clearly a very, very, very well connected dude. The G8 summits are the
place where all the recent world events since 10th Sept. 2001 were hatched.
And the trail of Sherpa Steinberg can be picked up again here:
| Quote: | Hawkwind:
"The Leaders’ National Security Advisory Group, commissioned by Senate Democratic Leader Reid and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi to provide advice to Congress on long-term national security challenges, is chaired by former Defense Secretary William J. Perry.
Its members include: Michele A. Flournoy, Madeleine K. Albright, Graham T. Allison, Samuel R. Berger, Ashton B. Carter, Wesley K. Clark, Thomas E. Donilon, John D. Podesta, Susan E. Rice, John M. Shalikashvili, Wendy R. Sherman, Elizabeth D. Sherwood-Randall, and James B. Steinberg."
Link
Had I got off my ass sooner, I would have posted the now completely deleted links to their little war games at the aspeninstitute.org ...
These people travel in very small/incestuous circles ... lets all welcome the Democrats? Fuck me ....
http://www.breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1096 |
Yep. That's the same National Security Advisory Group, and the same
James B. Steinberg whom I mentioned earlier. The group which Pelosi
had backed when they called for more money for a combat-ready reserve.
A group which she and Reid had set up in the first place.
So don't expect any change from the pre-planned gameplan.
When you get down to it, Pelosi is less than one degree of separation away
from the G8 power complex that is the source of all our problems.
Pelosi represents the Left? Yeah......
Slightly to the left of Ghengis Khan.
| Quote: | 
Activists Demand Pelosi Defund Iraq War, Support Impeachment
by Jeff Paterson, Not in Our Name
San Francisco (January 15, 2006) - Anti-War activists pressed local congresswoman Nancy Pelosi on her continued support of the Iraq War by way of continued funding for the illegal, unjust occupation - despite her public criticisms of the war.
Before the event even began, members of CODEPINK, College Not Combat, Not in Our Name and others picketed outside the Marina Middle School “town hall meeting.” Following Pelosi’s presentation members of CODEPINK made their way to the front of the hall were they were joined by dozens of other anti-war activists.
http://www.notinourname.net |
Last edited by Fintan on Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nat
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 851
Location: minime-rica
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| she's sure proud of that finger, hold it out with pride girl |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hawkwind
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 587
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: Constant Stream of Banality to the Forum ... See Above |
|
|
She's got Barbara Bush's eyes ...
Do tell Babs ...
Really Babs?
I promise to keep it to myself ...
- Hawk
_________________
"Time is a pony ride ... "
- Talking Heads
Last edited by hawkwind on Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:56 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Continuity
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 1582
Location: Municipal Flat Block 18A, Linear North
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is Babs actually wearing a badge that says 'Fuck You All' on it, or am I just hallucinating? (again)
_________________
The rule for today.
Touch my tail, I shred your hand.
New rule tomorrow.
Cat Haiku |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ormond
Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 1558
Location: Belly of the Beast, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Understanding American Rhetoric
IRON FINGER (Upyoursicus Maximus)
VELVET FINGER (Touchifeelicus petitecus)
American politicians aren't as stupid as they look. Working in unison toward the hidden agendas while appearing to be opposed to one another requires the genius of the greatest big con artists and illusionists worthy of Machiavelli. These people are professional grifters from a long line of professional grifters.
*sigh*....I can't keep up with the lies...
_________________
The anticipated never happens. The unexpected constantly occurs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fintan
Site Admin
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 5568
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Ormond:
IRON FINGER (Upyoursicus Maximus)
VELVET FINGER (Touchifeelicus petitecus) |
ROTFLMAO! 
For those not fully up to speed on all this, the following mainstream news
article should help.
I mean, now we can clearly see the how the velvet Pelosi/NATO crew
are the same bunch as the iron Bush/Pentagon crew....
we might as well complete the picture by adding Vladimir Putin to Ormond's
list of "professional grifters". See the red highlights below.
| Quote: |
NATO secretary-general to meet with Bush
WASHINGTON --NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, fresh from a visit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, is in Washington for talks about matters including the NATO chief's wish for closer relations between the alliance and Russia.
De Hoop Scheffer said he wanted to deepen the relationship between Moscow and NATO because of Russia's importance to solving many conflicts. "Russia's active participation for the solution of many conflicts is essential," de Hoop Scheffer told Putin.
Russia signed a partnership agreement with NATO in 2002, outlining cooperation in counterterror, nonproliferation, peacekeeping and other fields. At the same time Putin's government has continued to make public his opposition to the alliance's eastward expansion.
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2006/10/27/nato_secretary_general_to_meet_with_bush/
|
Russia signed a partnership deal with NATO, while publicly Putin is
making a lot of hot air about opposing NATO's eastward expansion, eh?
Like having your cake and eating it.
Except it isn't your cake any more --it's theirs.
Bush-Pentagon-Pelosi-NATO-Putin.
From Pelosi on the West Coast to Bush in the Oval Office on the East Coast,
via Tony Blair to Angela Merkel, Chirac and the EU et. al. and then on
eastwards to Putin.
From Anchorage, east to Vladivistok. The G8 NWO.
Last edited by Fintan on Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ormond
Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 1558
Location: Belly of the Beast, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Bush-Pentagon-Pelosi-NATO-Putin. |
The 'One Party Two Party' system is rather like what things might have been like back in the Roman Empire days--if they'd had television.
The Global 'Opposing Supernations' apparancey is based on the same grift. Pull away the curtain and we see the UberGrifters working together, since the intelligence/totalitarian systems of East and West developed during the 20th century are now mirror images of each other.
That's not conicendental. All they have to do is cooperate for one hidden agenda--and they can indeed manage global order under the auspices of what we see as G-8.
Back in the US:
From Pelosi's own official web site, here's the blurb for the Democrat angle:
| Quote: | AMERICA: THE NEW DIRECTION
“ Democrats are united in presenting a New Direction for America, one that will make our nation as strong as its people, one that brings opportunity, security, and prosperity to all Americans. ”
Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi |
Okay. We're all for a 'new direction'. What is it?
| Quote: | | The first responsibility of our government is the security of every American. In this era of unprecedented and unpredictable challenge, we must be prepared for any threat. Real Security will rebuild our military; equip and train our first responders and others on the front lines here at home; provide needed benefits to our troops and veterans; fully man and equip our National Guard; promote alternative fuels and reduce dependence on foreign oil; and, restore Americans' confidence in their government's ability to respond in the face of a terrorist attack or natural disaster. ~ Pelosi's web site |
What? Geeze, that sounds a lot like the 'old direction', 'stay the course'.
To those who know, this is pure rhetoric. The keywords of this 'new direction' of Democrats will show up on all of their websites and in all of their speeches...
"Homeland Security". "Threat of terrorism". But the US public's perceptual between these 'adversaries' and their Republican brothers and sisters has to do with Republicans letting things like public education and health care fall completely apart (which is the setup to hand it over to the return of Democrats).
What happens every time when the Dems come back to pick up the thread, they get to meddling in education and health care again---and that's where I predict we'll see the the National ID cards, mandatory mental 'evaluations' for all citizens, and possibly even chipping come up under the Dems as the hidden agenda.
Dems merely push through the things that don't work convincingly through the Republican frame. Republicans are expected to loot the treasury and throw bombs around overseas, Democrats are expected to meddle in our personal lives. Together they're a nemisis and canker sore on the American landscape (latter remark borrowed from Hunter Thompson in a 1988 editorial in the Rocky Mountain News. No web reference available, just recall very well reading it at the time. "Canker sore on the American landscape is just so apt.)
_________________
The anticipated never happens. The unexpected constantly occurs
Last edited by Ormond on Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:19 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Damian Flynn
Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 220
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The American Psycho and her Nazi friend
http://democraticleader.house.gov/press/articles.cfm?pressReleaseID=1789 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
backandtotheleft
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 92
Location: Deep Down
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since we're posting finger pics...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zak247
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 950
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You are absolutely correct. These so called liberals show their true colors, not on minority American citizens, they know that is politically incorrect and damaging to their bullshit fake liberal confidence game. But when it comes to Arabs, and other third world minorities, these people are all alike. Remember the Lebanon invasion; these liberals were jumping all over themselves to kiss the butt of the Zionist. Nancy Pelosi led the charge in defending the Nazi like Zionists. I also remember she and the other liberals jumping all over Maliki the Iraq strongman because he denounced the Israeli invasion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bornfree
Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 509
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ormond,
Reduce our dependence on foreign oil You are correct. We could also reduce our dependence on Cheap Communist China Labor 
The republicats in what seems like forever have been in Washington DC. How much longer before Sovereigns wake up to the fact that its good cop / bad cop?
Have you seen any politician anywhere advocating Sovereigns buy from their fellow Sovereigns? Chinese buy from Chinese, US buy from US, Mexico buy from Mexico.
The G8 are Globalizing the world and Sovereigns pretend it is the politicians who are forcing us to buy foreign goods!!!???
If the G8 seek to destroy US Jobs by making crappy products then if US Sovereigns would stop shopping how long before US Jobs would move back to the US??
The G8 can't fuck us without our help...and if they try to do so its rape. Of course that would require we stop lying to ourselves instead of whining that its GWBush doing the lying.
Nothing Hitler did in Nazi Germany was illegal !
So who was lying? Hilter or the German people who once he lost suddenly knew nothing...nothing.
If Hitler had won, Germans would still be gassing us.
Today, the G8 is bringing the lies we tell into global policy.
We don't have to stop believing the lies. We need to stop telling them.
Propaganda gives cover to liars.
Stop the propaganda by stop the lying.
Fortunately, break for news is exposing the lies we tell ourselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ormond
Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 1558
Location: Belly of the Beast, Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Reduce our dependence on foreign oil Laughing You are correct. We could also reduce our dependence on Cheap Communist China Labor |
Oh, that is so APT! I'm writing that down to use as a 'talking point' to all my bozo partisan acquaintances.
File it under W.W.W.T.P. (What's Wrong With This Picture)
They (or the media) won't touch the thought of returning industry to the US--there's no grift in that for them. So it just never gets addressed...not since Ross Perot in '92 did anybody mention that in public. And Perot was just giving lip service, as the public still was concerned about it at that time. Now it's like nobody gives of flyin' fark, long as they can buy Chinese drill bits or DVD players cheap as dirt. Thing is, that stuff isn't going to stay cheap. (though it will still break just as easily).
'Reducing dependence on foreign oil' -- they like that one, since they've got a grift prepared for that. See, EXXON makes a bundle off selling OPEC oil here and leaving ours in the ground. They make MORE profit doing it with that shell game. In reality, we are 'dependent' on OPEC because OPEC is belly to butt with US and UK Big Oil. It's EXXON the tells OPEC how much to pump. It's another 'controlled opposition' Hegelian dialectic.
Word in Houston is there's plenty of Texas oil sitting under idled derricks all through this decade, and they've just found a new motherload in the Gulf.
And they aren't going to touch it as long as OPEC can be the excuse for high cost.
No, when they say 'reducing dependence', they mean taxing it and selling it as such high cost that we'll use less of it. They'll still get their 40% annual hike in revenues. They'll just keep driving the price up. If not with raw price hikes, with slapping on a few more buck a gallon in tax.
| Quote: | | But when it comes to Arabs, and other third world minorities, these people are all alike. ~ Zak |
That's right--but even that bias is very selective. What's left out of media is that they are as tight with the Saudi Royals as they are with the Knesset--and Israel never says a word in complaint. They don't want us to notice that. You don't see the Israeli air force blasting Saudi Arabia or Kuwait with white phospherous bunker bombs.
And the Bin Laudin family has been tight with the Bush family for decades...they flew 100 of them out of the US quietly under US fighter escort right after 911.
File it under W.W.W.T.P.
Oh, what a tangled web we weave!
_________________
The anticipated never happens. The unexpected constantly occurs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zak247
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 950
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True Ormond, the Saudis and their British inspired Wahhabism are the house Negroes of the Arabs.
That concept of divide and conquer is so old, but it still works. It is interesting that in the bad publicity they got after the 911 hoax, it was primarily the Liberals who went after the Saudis and tried to make them the scapegoats. This most likely at the behest of the Israelis who wanted to put pressure on the Saudis and just generally foul up everything in the Mideast after 911.
Certainly the Bush’s protect the Saudis, and they wipe each others asses with all that oil money.
Boy what a racket! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rosalinda
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 355
Location: Mexico
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 12:28 am Post subject: NON-PARTISAN VETERANS GROUP GIVES INDIVIDUAL CONGRESSME |
|
|
[Source: Roll Call, Oct. 25; www.iavaaction.org]
NON-PARTISAN VETERANS GROUP GIVES INDIVIDUAL CONGRESSMEN
GRADE ON SUPPORT FOR TROOPS, WITH RESULTS THAT SURPRISE SOME.
The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, a non-partisan group of
veterans, has given grades to all members of Congress.
The group's Action Fund looked at 169 House votes and 155
Senate votes on such things as funding for body armor; health
insurance for veterans and National Guard members; brain injury
research; and an increase in the military's death benefit--the
question of the general welfare of the troops, versus rhetoric
about war--and averaged the votes. The group did not include the
vote to authorize the Iraq war, because it is non-partisan.
Some of the results? Only 14 members got A's, while 86
received D's and F's; e.g., Sen. John McCain: D; Rep. Nancy
Pelosi, B+; Sen. George Allen (R-Va.), Sen. Mike DeWine (R-Ohio):
both D+; Rep. James Moran (D-Va.): A-. Reps. Tom Davis and Frank Wolf: both C+.
Individual Congressmen can be looked up at www.iavaaction.org.
_________________
"It is through beauty, that one proceeds to freedom." - Friedrich Schiller |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
atlien
Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 92
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anybody see Pelosi on 60 Minutes Sunday, October 22nd?
Nazi Leslie Stahl asked her to pledge, to f#cking promise, that she wouldn't impeach Bush if Dems took the House.
Pelosi did it.
It was mid-level psyop du jour. Not subtle but impressive in how hard hitting and straight forward they can be with it.
Pelosi, pretended to struggle and be caught off guard by the question. The theater was interesting. After stammering for a second (as if Stahl were some kind of hard-hitting-take no prisoners interrogator), Pelosi pledged no impeachment, saying that they wouldn't have time for that and then going down a very short list of priorities the Dems would have if they took the House.
Has anyone seen the documentary, Spin, by Brian Springer? It was done in the mid 90s but is fantastic. It completely went down the memory hole for all I can tell. Watch it. And if you think the TV news is worth anything, anything at all, this documentary will disabuse you of that notion. It's all complete psyop and this documentary doesn't assert it, it shows you the footage where they used to openly plan it when they didn't think anyone was watching. It's mindblowing. If you have a high speed connection, you can download it off archive.org.
The url:
http://www.archive.org/download/ill-art/spin.mp4
It's 60 minutes long and well done.
Back to Nancy 'The Finger' Pelosi. Her program is a complete continuation of the agenda. But with the Velvet Glove, of course. It's disgusting how many folks down here in Atlanta are into the Dem Party, thinking it is a way out of this mess. Even on the local level it's just more of the same. Rich whites take control of the party's and do the same things all the time. The Republicans are overt, the Democrats more subtle but they both consistently screw the poor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
