Robot Planes

9/11 Evidence: Fact or Fantasy?
psikeyhackr
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:20 pm

Way, way Cool!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClDtwOR-3wQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fz5LuUpcCwU

That was my theory, but I don't know anything about flying. Switched planes controlled by robots. That would help explain the flash the instants before impact. They needed something to make the fuselage penetrate the perimeter columns and only a machine could fire the charge fast enough.

psik
Physics is Phutile
Fiziks is Fundamental
Since 9/11 physics is history
User avatar
Continuity
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Municipal Flat Block 18A, Linear North
Contact:

psikeyhackr wrote:That was my theory, but I don't know anything about flying. Switched planes controlled by robots. That would help explain the flash the instants before impact. They needed something to make the fuselage penetrate the perimeter columns and only a machine could fire the charge fast enough.
I don't actually see how that logic follows through... :?
The rule for today.
Touch my tail, I shred your hand.
New rule tomorrow.

Cat Haiku
psikeyhackr
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:20 pm

Continuity wrote:I don't actually see how that logic follows through... :?
If you watch the videos of the impacts for the north and south towers there were flashes the instant before the noses of the planes impacted the buildings.

WHAT WAS THAT? Why would a NORMAL airliner do that?

Could NORMAL airliners even penetrate the buildings that easily?

How could two human pilots hit buildings dead on? How do you get to practice such things in REAL flight simulators?

So if the planes were switched with computer controlled cruise airliners that could explain a bunch of things simultaneously.

psik
Physics is Phutile
Fiziks is Fundamental
Since 9/11 physics is history
SherryAnn
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 12:44 pm

I have a real interest in this subject but I haven't posted anything myself because I'm a bit intimidated by all the people who post on this board with all their well thought out theories, etc. But as I said, I am incredibly interested in all your thoughts and theories. I truly believe that the whole thing had to have been an inside job because it just doesn't add up. But I have so many questions that I was hoping someone could answer. A few of them are: why does Al Queda and/or the Saudis allow us to blame them for 9/11? What happened to the people on the airplanes? Why would Barbara Olsen's husband lie about his wife calling him? Was HE involved somehow? Were the alleged phone calls home, doctored somehow? Are the news stations pawns of the government? What will happen if people like you are able to convince a huge majority of people that it was an inside job....what will our government do?

Keep up the good fight. Thanks for all the work you do.
Hombre
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:58 am

Thanks 4 the post. I can't think of any reason to be intimidated or afraid to post your opinion or ask ANY question in regard to something so important.

The planes thing is a big one, many people have questions in that regard. One of mine is : Why would an operation of this size and scope be left to a Novice Human Pilot to complete? Personally I don't think it ever was drawn up that way, but that's just me. What it they missed or had second thoughts?

Another: The let's roll bullshit sales pitch: What if the passengers did in fact take control of the plane? What if there just happened to be a Novice Cessna bush pilot on board who may have been able to follow instructions and dump fuel, and crash land it in sufficient manner that allowed a few people to escape with their lives?

What if they had Guns instead of box-cutters? How to wiggle out from under the pre-scripted narrative of AL_k_DUH and " THEY HATE ARE WAY OF LIFE BULLSHIT " Makes zero sense.

Here's something that I've always found very very interesting in regard to 9-11. It's a simple observation: Why in every OFFICIAL piece of video evidence, every one, do they fade to black at key moments during broadcast? Hiding something or merely opening the door for yet another dog chasing it's tale opportunity?

Hombre'
User avatar
telstar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Darlington,Co.Durham

So if the planes brought the two towers down, then what brought building seven down the same way? Or did I miss something?
krammer
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:52 pm

If Fintan's theory that the angle of attack by the planes was the key factor in triggering the pancake collapse of the twin towers is correct, then it follows that building seven probably did collapse due to structural damage. The lack of cutter charge sounds in any of the broadcast audio or video precludes controlled demolition in my opinion. Although WTC 7 sure looks like a controlled demolition, pre-wiring an occupied office building with explosives does not seem to be a workable theory.
User avatar
telstar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Darlington,Co.Durham

And the firechief said 'what do you think?' and I said 'There's been so much loss of life, let's just PULL IT, and we watched the building collapse',

Remember that?
User avatar
telstar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Darlington,Co.Durham

If I may answer Sherry Ann here, Well the name Al-Qa'eda was a made up name by the CIA, it was a group of Arabs that the British organised in English it mean 'The Base'.
In 1888 the British sent a Thomas Edward Lawrence CB. DSO. with a regiment to Arabia to train the Arabs how to fight, make bombs,etc.
This was to attack the then Ottoman Empire, now known as Turkey. This British soldier may be better known as Lawrence of Arabia.

Hope this helps a little to explain that this Al-Qa'eda? is not a new band of Arabs that just started up to blow-up the twin towers.
krammer
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:52 pm

Yea, I remember it. Do you think that a building owner tells the fire chief that he should demolish the building?? Fire and Rescue are dedicated to saving life and property from fire.

Why would the owner tell the fire department to initiate controlled demolition of a building?? It makes no sense.

Likely this quote is referring to the firefighting efforts, something a building owner could possibly say to a fire chief. Of course the so called truth movement takes this quote out of context and runs it up the flagpole...to the embarrassment of all.
User avatar
telstar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Darlington,Co.Durham

Yes how about that owner had just insured those three buildings for millions against 'Terrorism' a month or so before they were attacked, I had loads of paperwork on this which all tended to point in one direction, but there is still a few unanswered questions, but I'm left with the averall opinion that this was one of many 'inside' jobs, I also took an interest in the incident with the American surveillance ship named USS Liberty.
User avatar
telstar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Darlington,Co.Durham

Just think about it, if he did tell them to "PULL IT", then it must have been pre-wired, as it takes quite awhile to wire a building that size to come down so perfectly.

But how about the most devout Islamic lads? They went to a club and were throwing money around with drink and wild woman, they even left a holy Coran, but sourly this sort of conduct is against the Holy Coran.
Also none of their names were on the planes flight manifesto's.

O the list just goes on.................
Don't walk infront of me for I may not follow,
Don't walk behind me for I may not lead,
Just walk by my side and be my friend.
Post Reply