The Rat's Nest of 9/11: Part 2
'Scooter,' Reggie & the Birds of a Feather
In the CIA Internet Fakes, released 4th August, 2005, we outed
a host of websites --either controlled by the CIA/FBI/KGB/ETC,
or hopelessly compromised by willingly gushing out heaps of Intel-
designed 9/11 Tabloid Crud. Then, in 9/11 Rats Nest: Part 1
we identified the people trying so hard to fool you.
Now, let's see how the same crew of CIA Fakes have staged
'PlameGate,' and other pivotal CIA-managed operations.
by Fintan Dunne, BreakForNews.com 14 Feb, 2006
URL: http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=454#454
Some of this ground, I have covered before, as you will see if you follow
the key hyperlinks. But developments in the Scooter Libby's 'PlameGate'
case mean that an overview of events is going to be very informative.
It's going to show you how the CIA Fakes are singing dumb on the most
blatant piece of political engineering since... well, since
WaterGate!
The CIA Fakes are careful never to clue you in to the really key 'Ops.'
God forbid you should figure out what is really going on. And it doesn't
take the wisdom of Solomon to discern it. As you will see.
Speaking of Solomon, and as a good starting point, consider this article
from Norman Solomon on the usually, rather unsurprising AlterNet.
Can you read between these lines? This is about as close as anyone
besides yours truly has come to outing Judith Miller as a CIA agent.
Here's goes Norman Solomon, sailing as close to the wind as the
mainstream allows, in this commentary on PlameGate:
Judith Miller, the Fourth Estate and the Warfare State
By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. October 17, 2005.
During the propaganda buildup for the invasion of Iraq, Judith Miller and the New York Times
served as a key asset of the warfare state.
Judith Miller is a reporter for the New York Times. After the invasion, on assignment to cover a U.S. military unit as it searches for WMDs in Iraq, she's given "clearance" by the Pentagon "to see secret information" -- which she "was not permitted to discuss" with Times editors.
"There's nothing wrong with this picture if Judith Miller is an intelligence operative for the U.S. government. But if she's supposed to be a journalist, this is a preposterous situation..."
http://alternet.org/columnists/story/26947/
Well! If that isn't dropping a big hint that Miller is one of the legion of CIA
hacks spattered across mainstream and alternative media, then Solomon
must be just exercising his writing talent to uselessly pad out sentences.
I've
been saying since early Fall 2005, that the Plame affair is a contrived
scandal. Just as 'MonicaGate'' was. Just as WaterGate was.
All these are CIA/Establishment constructions to keep the masses amused
and befuddled, while arranging political earthquakes which signal planned
shifts in the landscape of the monotonous, two-in-one-party US political
monopoly. And the more it changes, the more it stays the same.
And if even Solomon can point to the tip of that iceberg, then surely that
begs the question of why
we are so vocal about the rest of the iceberg --
while the CIA Fakes are buzy singing dumb.
Because this is
much bigger than just Judith Miller. (Who only did jail time
because that was necessary to give legs to the PlameGate scandal. All part
of the carefull coreography of this well-managed "scandal.")
SEE NO EVIL
First they promised the Democratic heartland the head of George Bush.
It never happened. Kerry's deep roots in the D.C. establishment saw to that.
Then it was Karl Rove's head which was dangled as bait to keep the left
clinging to the delusion of real politics. But GannonGate never paid off.
Now it is Dick Cheney's head which is the latest lure. That prospect has
always been the subtext of the PlameGate issue. It won't happen.
But that must never be even hinted at by the left's disinformation crew.
To illustrate, here's some calculated spinning by Justin Raimondo, who
clearly buys all this BS - or appears to anyway:
"Before Fitzgerald is done, we'll see the warlords of Washington hauled before a court of the people. We'll hear the whole sordid story of how a band of exiles, at least two foreign intelligence agencies, and
a cabal of neoconservatives inside the Pentagon and the vice president's office
bamboozled Congress and the American people into going to war."
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7681
Note the persistent "Blame it on the Neocons" angle. They "bamboozled
Congress," you see. Their tail wagged the world superpower dog.
( According to this prefabricated "fall-guys" routine, the invasion of Iraq and
the preceeding mass-murder on the 9/11, were NOT the bright idea of the
Washington Establishment and their G8 henchmen. They are peace-loving
diplomats who were simply fooled by the nasty neocons.
ROTFLMAO! )
The latest Plamegate developments are being hyped by the left media, as
if the heads of both Libby and of Cheney are already on the block -
awaiting the coup-de-grace.
Forget it. Try this level-headed assesment from one mainstream reporter
who can see exactly why
Libby is going to walk -despite the hype:
Cheney 'Authorized' Libby to Leak Classified Information
By Murray Waas, National Journal, Thursday, Feb. 9, 2006
© National Journal Group Inc.
...The new information indicates that Libby is likely to pursue a defense during his trial that he was
broadly "authorized" by Cheney and other "superiors" to defend the Bush administration in making the case to go to war. Libby
does not, however, appear to be claiming that he was acting specifically on Cheney's behalf in disclosing information about Plame to the press.
Libby's legal strategy in asserting that Cheney and other Bush administration officials authorized activities related to the underlying allegations of criminal conduct leveled against him, without approving of or encouraging him to engage in the specific misconduct,
is reminiscent of the defense strategy used by Oliver North, who was a National Security Council official in the Reagan administration.....
If Libby's defense adopts strategies used by North, it might be in part because the strategies largely worked for North and in part because
Libby's defense team has quietly retained John D. Cline, who was a defense attorney for North....
Among his detractors, Cline is what is known as a "graymail" specialist-an attorney who, critics say, purposely makes onerous demands on the federal government to disclose classified information in the course of defending his clients,
in an effort to force the government to dismiss the charges....
In the Libby case, Cline has frustrated prosecutors by demanding, as part of pretrial discovery, more than 10 months of the President's Daily Brief, or PDBs, the president's morning intelligence briefing....
In the North case, the Iran-Contra independent counsel, Lawrence Walsh, was forced to dismiss many of the central charges against North, ..... because intelligence agencies and
the Reagan administration refused to declassify documents necessary for a trial on those charges.
"
It was a backdoor way of shutting us down," said one former Iran-Contra prosecutor.... "It was a cover-up by means of an administrative action, and it was an effective cover-up at that."
http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweek ... 209nj1.htm
Stop Press: Libby Lawyer Launches "Greymail" Bid
Fri, Feb. 17, 2006 ...In arguments filed late Thursday, Fitzgerald said Libby's lawyers were
trying to derail the perjury and obstruction case by pressing for nearly a year's worth of presidential daily briefs... Fitzgerald accused Libby of attempting to
commit "greymail,"... On Friday, Libby attorney John Cline denied that the defense was trying to derail the case. "We are working lawfully and properly ... to obtain documents essential to Mr. Libby's defense," he said.
http://breakfornews.com/my/modules.php? ... =0&thold=0
So there you have it. Would the Bush Administration sink the Libby case
by refusing to declassify?
In an instant.
Especially if they knew the judge in the case would play ball and dismiss.
And would he? Don't make me laugh more. It hurts too much.
He is sitting on the case, by arrangement,
precisely so that he
can dismiss using the ol' tried and trusted 'North Gambit.'
Because that's always been the gameplan.
The Libby case is a fake.
Note that Judge Reggie Walton is presiding over the Libby case.
And so, ponder the implications of this:
Walton was appointed to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia by
President Reagan from 1981 to 1989. And by
President George
H. W. Bush from 1991 to 2001.
He was nominated as a United States District Judge for the District of
Columbia on October 29, 2001, by
President George W. Bush Link
Grab a load of
that, and get your bets down with the bookies.
And it gets worse. Far worse.
GOODNIGHT JON BOY
Reggie Walton is the judge who handled the
Stephen Hatfill anthrax case.
In March, 2004, Walton granted the FBI's request to postpone Hatfill's
defamation suit, claiming that the investigation was in a sensitive phase.
Which is a bit of a sick joke, as the FBI's investigation has
always
been in a "
sensitive" phase. Just like all other government Ops.
And it was Walton
who upheld the government's right to state secrets in
the Sibel Edmonds case! Another contrived 'scandal' which went nowhere.
Does this guy turn up in all the right places, or what? When the Establishment
run these kind of Ops, they need a judge who is a safe pair of hands.
Or to put it another way: they need a judge who is
in on it.
But, now you are in on it too.
But this is not just about Walton. Not by a long shot. He's just one player.
Already, there is enough here that, even in their own terms, the CIA Fakes
should be sounding alarm bells about Walton's presence in the Libby
case --rather than blindly cheerleading the chances of Cheney's and
Libby's downfall.
The reason they are not being up front, is that you are
suppposed to be
sucked into yet another fruitless substitute for effective political opposition
to the Washington elite and their international corporate buddies.
And the Fakes' job is to make
sure you are.
But they are not the only ones on the job. And there are other jobs too.
Nobody is drawing out the barely hidden links. But
we are.
RAT'S NEST 2
Here are the links nobody wants to highlight, because they give the game(s) away.
Patrick Fitzgerald, who is prosecuting Libby, handled the 1993 World Trade
Center bombing prosecution of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman. Another, shall
we say, "sensitive" case.
And if you accept our proposition that the Neocons are programmed fall guys,
then you might deem it significant that it is Fitzgerald
who spearheaded
the downfall of Lord Conrad Black from his chairmanship of the
Neocon-ridden Hollinger Group - of which Richard Perle is a director.
Like Walton, Fitzgerald pops up in
all the right places.
But, again this is not
just about those two political hacks. Let's plow on.
Representing Sibel Edmonds in that "State Secrets" gag order case
presided over by Walton was long-time, legal hack for disgrunled CIA
officers -Mark Zaid. If you are on the outs with the Agency, then Zaid is
your man.
On the other hand, if you are
pretending to be on the outs with the CIA,
Mark is
definitely your man.
In the case of such tried-and-trusted ploys for establishing some flimsy
street cred as an "opponent" of the CIA, the last thing you, or the agency
need is a lawyer who might take the whole thing too seriously and actually
expose things the Agency might not want you to think you had "found out"
anyway (-as part of the deception).
Much better to have a pet lawyer, who can huff and puff with the best of them
but blow nobody's house down in the process. And what better cover to
use to pose as a whistleblower than to be conveniently silenced by the
government -with the help of a CIA lawyer and a Bush judge.
Sibel would love to spill the beans on Mohammed Atta. Really, she would!
But unfortunately she can't. Go figure.
Here's Zaid, commenting on the
gag order Walton imposed on Edmonds:
FBI Whistleblower Edmonds Files New Lawsuit - March 17, 2005
"The FBI has done nothing but cover up its own incompetence and wrongdoing throughout its efforts to unconscionably
and
unlawfully silence Ms. Edmonds through excessive secrecy," said Mark S. Zaid.
http://www.antiwar.com/edmonds/?articleid=5233
Zaid is getting good at those kind of comments. He gets practice, you see.
Because the
exact same MO applies in
another high-profile case he is handling.
Here's Zaid again:
National Security Watch: Disquieted whistle-blowers
By Kevin Whitelaw 10/11/05
One of the biggest names of the conference never even uttered a word.
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer is the military intelligence operative who recently went public with a controversial claim that a year before September 11, his top-secret task force
"Able Danger" was able to identify the man who later turned out to be the lead hijacker as being connected to al Qaeda.
"Tony is not allowed to talk," Zaid said. "He is effectively gagged from talking. He is gagged from talking to Congress."
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/artic ... natsec.htm
Like Sibel, Tony Schaffer would love to spill the beans on Mohammed Atta.
Really, he would! But unfortunately he can't. Go figure.
How many more want to tell us all about Atta, but are gagged?
And will Mark Zaid represent then all? Maybe his yellow pages
advertizing should read "Atta Gag Orders a Speciaity."
Maybe that should read "Atta Gag Orders an Assignment."
...AND IF IT QUACKS LIKE A DUCK....
Let's step back and take another look at the way a far too cosy crew keep
popping up in these related issues.
1993 WTC Bombing
Partick Fitzgerald prosecuting Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman.
Neocon Black
Partick Fitzgerald prosecuting Conrad Black.
Neocon Libby
Partick Fitzgerald prosecuting 'Scooter' Libby.
Reggie Walton as presiding judge.
9/11 Anthrax
Reggie Walton as Hatfill case presiding judge.
9/11 Mohammed Atta / FBI
Mark Zaid representing Sibel Edmonds.
Reggie Walton as presiding judge.
9/11 Mohammed Atta / Pentagon
Mark Zaid representing Tony Shaffer.
Now, let me put it to you that all these are either sensitive cases the
government wants handled the right way, or intelligence operations the
Agency wants handled the right way -or the intersection of the two.
Let me put it to you that the people involved in the intelligence operations
are run/employed by the CIA. A cozy crew, who can run a tight ship.
Let me put it to you that if PlameGate is a contrived scandal, then Valerie
Plame is not the only CIA agent involved. Outsiders do NOT get to play a
part in such high-level Ops. Who knows what a real journalist might do.
Or a real prosecutor or judge, for that matter. PlameGate is stacked with
players who each know exactly what to do, and when.
Let me put it to you that top-quality agents with good street/media cred
don't grow on trees. And so, for key moves you reuse the same personnel
and simply rely on the Fake alternative media to fail to draw attention to
the fact the same players
keep coming up.
Like birds of a feather, they stick together.
Finally, let me put it to you that the failure of any other reporter to detail
these links to you is clear confirmation of our warning in August of last year
that the CIA are deeply entrenched in the alternative and 'conspiracy' media,
and they effectively run the 9/11 movement.
Enough already. I have laid the facts out clearly.
Take a leaf out of Reggie Walton's book...
Now,
you be the Judge.
Kind of like, "Excuse me, but you're not being successful in what I hope is an attempt to not stand on my toe there, sir."
