9/11 Deja Vu Audios: Wall St. & Nazis

[Hombre]

Hawkwind: some people take 9-11 very seriously, they despise jokes, and the smug attitude of some who claim to be after the truth.

You're kind of like the Pot calling the Kettle black in that regard. I made a joke about partners, that's what those two are, partners. Did that bell go un-rung?

It Wasn't a joke, or clever little hint about how dumb someone is for NOT agreeing with each and every single thing put down by people working in the area called 9-11. That's written or implied!

Smug smart ass attitudes sometimes get shoved down a persons throat, I've seen it a few times in the past. There's several ways to do it, most common today is the pink slip, while in the past in some cases it my well have involved an invitation to step outside. I guess we've become somewhat civilized. I served you a softball, I'm somewhat disappointed that you didn't call me a name.

And Hawk--I don't have an f,ing agenda. I'm much too busy to piss around with such foolishness.

What evidence do I have to refute Fintan's research? Kind of like this Hawk:

All of those who saw a Plane are correct, I mean they have to be because they were an eyewitness, yet all of those who say they didn't see a Plane, despite being same ( said) eyewitness are nuts, or lying, or loopy, or crazy, or.... obviously that's just one example.

I guess we could point to the endless unanswered questions as another. Rest assured I've nothing against Mr Dunne whatsoever, he's done fine work in certain areas, But his fear mongering in regard to the BP thing was uncalled for.

Anyone with half a brain easily understood the severity of the disaster/accident---Very very unprofessional to pound the drum like the world was coming to an end, and do so on a daily basis. The Clown form Maine was the straw that broke the Camel's back. You know the guy who's heart just up and quite on him.

No doubt there was a hint of it being foul play due to his EXPERTISE in the Oil patch, and it was no mistake that it was quickly mentioned on the various fear-mongering sites around the web as being a BP hit. The only problem---it was bullshit. Anyway I've drifted out to sea a bit, my emotions have gotten the best of me--so.

Pretty simple stuff-you can have all the expertise in the world, do all the research you want to, but if you continue to ignore basic everyday commons sense, or ignore simple questions on a regular basis, at the end of the day you've really done nothing. All you've accomplished is the very thing that you seem to accuse everyone else of doing when it comes to 9-11. Fostering or pushing an agenda.

Hombre'

[Hombre]

Here:

another dumb question.

Please Explain this photo? Is this an obvious sales pitch or have I gone loopy? Who in their right mind would have a card printed up and ready to go in advance, one that explains the debris in detail? lol How f,ing dumb do you think people really are?



Hombre'

[bri]

I've got faith. Keep it up, you know who you are...

[Hombre]

Crickets


Hombre'

[Fintan]

I'd like to introduce an analysis of the WTC Towers collapses
which seems to explain what is going on better than either the
NIST version or some wilder 9/11 Truth ideas......

It's called ROOSD :

The Runaway OOS Destruction Collapse Model,
and you can read about the model at the hyperlink above.

It's about the destruction of the open floor pans which
are the ties holding the outer facade to the inner core.



I'm going to give you the fast Executive Briefing version of it:

"OOS means Open Office Space flooring. It is the flooring which was
outside the core and connected the core to the perimeter walls.

This collapse model can explain this interesting fact about the rubble:

[MichaelC]

I have been re-reading the first page of the "CIA FAKES".

Fintan's essay contains so much important and basic information that it bears mentioning again - lest anyone forget.


http://www.breakfornews.com/TheCIAInternetFakes.htm

[Fintan]

So, maybe you know that I've been examining if it is possible
that the precision plane strikes alone brought down the WTC
Towers --by igniting fires on multiple floors -thus weakening floors
and columns; and by damage to core and perimeter columns.

I've been saying that the unique design of the Towers
made them vulnerable to exactly this kind of attack.

So I'm glad to see that others are looking at this also.

The extract below is the from a thread on "the911forum"
discussing the "Ex-ante vulnerability of WTC".

Ex-ante meaning vulnerable "before the event" in it's design.

[Peter]

Planned obsolescence taken to its logical and predictable end.

Not so much planned as exploited, though. Those that saw the "need" for an op and were aware that when the first WTC bombing occurred they were informed that the towers were susceptible to catastrophic collapse given the "right" parameters.

Just a matter of getting it done and letting the situation run its course.

[Craig W]

ROOSD - very interesting hypothesis...

Keep it up, fellas.

[Raphael]

[Hombre]

This is absolutely amazing. It makes me truly wonder what the hell is really going on here. This sometimes brilliant analysis often morphs into the utterly ridiculous, especially when it comes to the overly obvious attempts to justify why those towers collapsed in the manner visible to all of video.

The unique design of the buildings: That's interesting yet doesn't explain the complete destruction of nearly ( 95% plus nearly ) all contents of both towers during the process---neither does it explain the large fire that occurred in the 70's having zero to NO impact on the integrity of the Tower affected.

" Well you see silly man, it's just that things get destructed when heavy shit falls down on top of them from above " " We're talking tons and tons here son " lol--Ridiculous I says.

Fintan: The Interview you did with Fetzer back a few years ago is now a 404--Why? Where did it go?

It's the one where you say that you've been to nearly every state in the US--

What's that got to do with Perfect strikes, unique designs and angled attacks? Nothing of course, it just begs a few questions.

I just finished a very interesting book written by Chalmers Johnson, I must admit I've not read his others works, but this one in particular reeks of Intelligence, subtle yet clear enough.

The Book is titled: Dismantling The Empire. Without going into detail and boring the piss out of everyone---it's not long into the book before 9-11 is mentioned and the why portion is explained in detail, it's an interesting twist on just how easy it really is to explain something ( anything ) to those LESS INFORMED.

It's a classic intel technique and I must admit that the signs of just that very thing are plainly evident within some of your 9-11 lines of thought. JMHO yet one an actual informed reader can't help but notice.

Johnson is President of the Japan Policy Research Institute. Politics and Intelligence, a match made in Heaven. lol



Hombre'

[Lord Carpainter]

[bri]

Gonna have to play devil's advocate on that one...

[MichaelC]

I thought cell phone calls from airborne jets were physically/technologically impossible then.

[bri]