9/11 Deja Vu Audios: Wall St. & Nazis

[Fintan]

[Big Boss]

Niiiiiice Fintan, time for me to eat up . Also, Rahm Emanuel has been replaced in the White House guys, whats the objective?

http://www.examiner.com/dc-in-washington-dc/rahm-emanuel-leaves-white-house-replacement-named

[Hombre]

The shot of the object in the clip shot by the guy who's kid almost erased it is at the very best, inconclusive. The other clip has to be an illustration, as it should due to circumstance, and it is, it's animated.

When you get to the caption:

" Noise was blocked by the tall reddish building "

one must come to a sudden an absolute halt because that's utter rubbish. The author of that video had never heard a large jet twin of any kind, at the speed, anywhere, or at any time ever. The noise is so distinctive and at that air speed would trail the plane by a wide distance. So that is an absolute comical attempt at explaining away the lack of thundering noise from above. Something tells me that it's very very possible that it ain't a real world event. But maybe the Plane, at sub 1,000 ft ELV, was in fact doing the recommended air speed which would account for the lack of noise and the need to somehow explain it all away.

I do however agree 100% on the wire angle, no way they would trust the operation to be carried out by a live human. So how can it be that they would ever bank on the design of the buildings to provide the desired effect once instigated by the planes and the fire alone?

In my opinion they wouldn't, and based on the visual evidence of the collapse, they didn't. The Planes and the Fire had help.

Hombre'

[PHDee]

Fintan wrote;

'' based on these WTC videos and previous videos of the
Pentagon flight path.''


Just out of curiosity, Fintan, how do you reconcile these two Pentagon flight paths?


1. The flight path used by the 9/11 commission in their deliberations, based on alleged eyewitness reports and damage to the building and the lamp posts allegedly caused by Flight 77.

2. The NIST flight path, shown in their video animation, allegedly based on black box data from Flight 77, which shows a flight path that doesn't even nearly coincide with the damage to the building and light poles allegedly caused by Flight 77.


Could it be that if the airliner is radio controlled and the angle of the discrepancy between the two angles of the flight paths is just the right angle it proves that Flight 77 went where Flight 77 didn't go, and that it used two different flight paths to get there?


PHDee

[hawkwind]

[Sasha]

LoOk Pa:

Even the best made aircraft have trouble staying together on the INITIAL impact. This is what a real airliner crash looks like:

[Fintan]

Three 9/11 Planes.
Three Perfect Strikes.

Analysis of the three plane strikes on 9/11 shows the planes struck
their targets with such a high level of precision that their flight paths
must have been computer controlled.

In the case of the Pentagon, the plane performed an acrobatic turn and then
tracked into the building at low height and high speed.

In the case of the North Tower, the angled plane impact hit the
dead center of the side of the building to within a few feet, while
also banking to one side -- thus spreading destruction and jet fuel
over many floors. The plane at impact was also close to perpendicular
with the side of the building as it struck.

In the case of the South Tower, two course corrections in the last five
seconds took the plane into another angled strike, also close to
square-on, perpendicular with the side of the building.

[Fintan]

Here's a graphic extracted from the video in my
previous post: "Last 12 Seconds South Tower"

[Hombre]

[hawkwind]

Fruit loop ... cuckoo cuckoo ...



- Hawk

[Big Boss]

Hawk come on, that was PS'd..........................(sarcasm lol)

[Hombre]

Yeah I like this one better. It speaks volumes.



Have a nice day!

Hombre'

[Fintan]

So here we are four or five years after the
NIST reports were issued, and we find that
their analysis of the South Tower impact is
a crock:

Why?: The angle of the plane entry is wrong,
and thus all their analysis of the effect on the
interior columns is flawed.

Here's how and why they got it wrong:

We know the right engine exited the north east corner
of the South Tower. So NIST figure all they have to do
is pinpoint the entry point of the right engine into the
south face of the Tower; draw a line to the exit point;
and hey presto!... that's the angle of entry.

[Sasha]

Planes are made of light materials like aluminum and fiberglass. Think of them as long beer cans. Even birds can give planes problems. The nose cone of the 'plane' cannot be the object exiting the structure. The object has to be a uranium tip or tungsten tip penetrator or CGI imaging. No momentum is lost by this object from impact to exit.

That engine/part above is not from a 767 or a 757. The engine/part shown above in that image is not 15 ft across as per spec sheets.

Quote CNN: 'In January, Emirates airline plans to launch mobile phone usage in its planes, making it the first airline to allow passengers to make cell phone calls on its flights.'
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/12/21/wired.airlines/index.html

If you could call why this headline on the new tech connecting peeps.

These cell phone call connected stories are lies. Hard to buy into planes flying around for an hr and a half unfettered. Then bullshit stories about heroes this and bad guys that on the line. Cell phones use line of site towers that are land based. The towers were never configured to deliver or recieve service directly from or to customers flying along at 30-40000ft. How stupid do they think people are?

To protect the integrity of the electronic control and navigation equipment aboard large airliners in commercial service the use of cellphones designed for terrestrial service is forbidden. The FCC did, however, allocate spectra in the 450 MHz and 800 MHz frequency bands for use by equipment designed and tested as "safe for air-to-ground service" and these systems use widely separated ground stations. In the 450 MHz band co-channel assignments are at least 497 miles apart and in the 800 MHz band only specific sites were authorized by the FCC. The 450 MHz service is limited to "general aviation" users, in corporate jets mostly, while the 800 MHz spectrum can be used by airliners as well as for general aviation. The 450 MHz spectrum is named AGRAS while the 800 MHz service was under review following an auction of the spectrum in 2006.

The cell phone network tower siting distances make these calls impossible.

Planes are Faraday cages above 400ft by eliminating outside signals coming in, and inside signals escaping. There are openings to the outside on everyplane of course. Regardless, it was virtually impossible to connect at low altitudes (4000 to 1000 ft) and then to remain connected if successful. NO calls were possible in 2001 based on the official story of ALTITUDE AT TIME OF CALL CONNECTIONS. The official position states the calls were connected, some lasting as long as 12 minutes, at 30 000ft. More than one call got through? I cannot buy this part of the story. So who made this shit up? And why? Arabs? Taleban?

Or the elitist fraternity scumbags.

[hawkwind]